Human control

AI can organize the first pass. Your team controls the final one.

Review status, notes, edits, and history help turn proposed case material into work the team has actually checked.

What it changes

A generated item should be easy to challenge. Give reviewers a clear place to approve, reject, edit, merge, suppress, and document why.

Review or reject proposed chronology events

Add notes and make corrections with the source in view

See how a reviewed item changed over time

Inside the workflow

Attorney Review

A fictional matter illustrates the review surface. Open a citation when one appears below.

SHIVRU AI / Attorney reviewSYNTHETIC CASE
MATTER A-104Event review
Review in progress
CHRONOLOGY EVENT · MAR 12, 2025

Initial evaluation

Westbridge Urgent Care documented lower-back discomfort after the incident.

Records packet 02 · p. 14
Approve✕ Reject✎ Edit
Reviewer note Check visit-date stamp against source.

Human review is a product control, not a disclaimer placed after the output.

A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

What this looks like in a case review.

A reviewer corrects the visit date after checking the source page, adds a note about an ambiguous stamp, and leaves the event pending attorney approval.

THE NEXT DECISIONReview the source. Record the judgment. Keep open items visible.Follow the full workflow
See it in context

See the review workflow.

See how attorney review fits into a real review conversation, using a synthetic matter and its source pages.